Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1602

reference
217-tree-1
name
1602
tree-preservation-order

undefined

217-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.043732 50.895037)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.043576 50.895020,-1.043583 50.895051,-1.043604 50.895078,-1.043639 50.895101,-1.043682 50.895115,-1.043730 50.895120,-1.043779 50.895116,-1.043822 50.895102,-1.043858 50.895080,-1.043880 50.895053,-1.043889 50.895023,-1.043882 50.894992,-1.043860 50.894964,-1.043826 50.894942,-1.043782 50.894928,-1.043734 50.894922,-1.043686 50.894927,-1.043642 50.894941,-1.043607 50.894962,-1.043584 50.894989,-1.043576 50.895020)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL